HSE Schools, HSEA, traditional vs. interest based bargaining

At Wednesday’s Hamilton Southeastern (HSE) School Board meeting, members of the Hamilton Southeastern Education Association bargaining team spoke before the board with comments about the upcoming negotiations between HSEA, representing district teachers, and HSE administrators.  One point the two members of the HSEA negotiating team made was a change from interest-based bargaining to a more traditional, also called positional, bargaining model.  What is the difference between these two methods of conducting bargaining?

During my 28 years as a federal civil servant, I spent time as both a union official, and a part of management, at different times during my career.  I have seen both types of bargaining up close and personal.  There is a difference.

One of my college professors likened traditional (positional) negotiations to a football field.  Both parties start the talks in their respective end zones, both knowing the final agreement will end up at mid-field, between the 40 yard lines.  It takes longer and can sometimes (but not always) be confrontational.  It takes a long time to keep exchanging proposals with small or no concessions from each side.  Putting it another way, it is a long slog.

Interest-based bargaining is a much different approach.  Here, each side knows what they want in a final agreement and lay it out during the first bargaining session.  The parties immediately look for ways to end up in a place where both sides can achieve most of what they want, without the lengthy process of keeping that goal hidden in traditional negotiations.

For interest-based bargaining to succeed, both parties must be honest and trust each other.

HSEA is saying the interest-based negotiations of past years have produced contracts praised by both parties and the community as a whole.  And it normally only takes a few days.

Also, HSEA is concerned that the current school board and administration are hiring attorneys to conduct the bargaining on behalf of the district.  The teachers’ union argues that local administrators headed-up the management side of the table in past years, and voiced concern about the change.

Indiana law says teachers-school district bargaining can begin now and the deadline for a deal is November 15.

Will traditional bargaining, not interest-based, produce a fair agreement for teachers and the HSE District?  Will having attorneys represent the district help get a final agreement or become an obstacle to a deal?

Only time will tell whether these changes in HSE Schools’ approach to bargaining a new contract with HSEA will be a good thing, or not.

2 thoughts on “HSE Schools, HSEA, traditional vs. interest based bargaining

  1. As has been on display since his hire, it is clear this move to intimidate our teachers and union. The ultimate goal is dismantling the union. He has a very clear authoritarian style of doing business. The problem is that he is discrediting how much this community supports and respects our teachers. We need THEM, not HIM. He acts as if he runs the schools and the school board. He might own 4 members of our board, but he doesn’t own the teachers or this community. He needs to respect our teachers, we will NOT lose them over his dominance issues.

  2. Larry! I was nice to meet you after all these years of reading you – and hearing of you – at the Mudsock Game last Friday. Wishing you many more years of communications on behalf of those of us who live and or work in Hamilton County.

    Be Blessed,

    Carole Palazzo

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.